BACKGROUND: Trips and slips increase fall risk for young and older adults. To examine recovery responses, studies utilized treadmill and/or over-ground methods to simulate real-world perturbations. However, differences in the recovery response between treadmill and over-ground perturbations remain unexamined. RESEARCH QUESTION: to assess the current literature on the reactive recovery responses between over-ground- and split-belt treadmill trips and slips as well as the effect of aging on these responses. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched for publications examining trips and slips in healthy young, healthy older adults, and older adults who fall. Included articles were in English, full-text accessible, and biomechanically quantified the reactive recovery responses for slips and trips during either over-ground or split-belt treadmill protocols. The initial database search yielded 1075 articles and 31 articles were included after title, abstract, and full-text screening. RESULTS: for slips, 7 articles utilized lubricated surfaces while 5 articles used treadmills. Further, 3 studies examined differences between older and younger adults. For trips, 9 articles utilized obstacles and 7 used treadmills. Further, 4 articles examined differences between older and young adults and 1 article only examined older adults during over-ground trips. For both perturbations, treadmill and over-ground protocols demonstrated similar anteroposterior destabilization on the center of mass. In the mediolateral direction, over-ground slips consistently found a lateral destabilization while treadmill articles did not examine this direction. Foot placement recovery responses varied less for both perturbation directions on a treadmill compared to over-ground. SIGNIFICANCE: Although treadmill and over-ground perturbations destabilize the center of mass similarly, the recovery response to these perturbations were different on treadmills. Specifically, recovery responses were more consistent for both slips and trips on treadmills. As older adults have difficulty in perturbation recovery scaling, treadmills may be limited in their ability to investigate the variety of aging impairments on perturbation recovery responses.

Lateral stepping is a motor task that is widely used in everyday life to modify the base of support, change direction, and avoid obstacles. Anticipatory Postural Adjustments (APAs) are often analyzed to describe postural preparation prior to forward stepping, however, little is known about lateral stepping. The aim of the study is to characterize APAs preceding lateral steps and to investigate how these are affected by footwear and lower limb preference. Twenty-two healthy young participants performed a lateral step using both their preferred and non-preferred leg in both barefoot and shod conditions. APA spatiotemporal parameters (size, duration, and speed) along both the anteroposterior and mediolateral axes were obtained through force plate data. APAs preceding lateral stepping showed typical patterns both along the anteroposterior and mediolateral axis. RM-ANOVA highlighted a significant effect of footwear only on medio-lateral APAs amplitude (p = 0.008) and velocity (p = 0.037). No differences were found for the limb preference. APAs in lateral stepping presented consistent features in the sagittal component, regardless of limb/shoe factors. Interestingly, the study observed that footwear induced an increase in the medio-lateral APAs size and velocity, highlighting the importance of including this factor when studying lateral stepping.